Есть вопросы?
закрыть

Contract & Commonwealth: Thomas Hobbes

00:00:00
PROFESSOR: So we have two basic agenda items today.
00:00:05
The first is to finish up briefly our discussion of
00:00:10
punishment from last lecture.
00:00:13
And the second is to start with the third unit of the
00:00:17
course, that is the unit that's concerned not with our
00:00:22
status as individuals trying to cultivate a kind of
00:00:25
internal harmony, nor with our status as individuals in local
00:00:31
relations with others of a moral or immoral sort, but
00:00:36
rather with our status as members of a community.
00:00:40
And you'll remember from Plato's Republic, the text
00:00:44
with which we begin and with which we'll end the course,
00:00:47
that Plato sees there being a direct parallel between the
00:00:51
individual and the community, between what's mandated for
00:00:55
the harmonious soul on the one hand, and what's required for
00:00:58
a community to stay stable on the other.
00:01:00
And one of the tacit themes that will underlie our
00:01:04
discussion in this final unit of the course are the ways in
00:01:09
which that parallel is manifest.
00:01:12
Now to some extent our discussion of punishment
00:01:17
provided a microcosm of this transition.
00:01:22
You'll recall that in the first lecture on punishment we
00:01:26
looked at three questions.
00:01:29
We tried to articulate in a fairly precise sense what we
00:01:33
meant by the notion of civil punishment.
00:01:36
And then we looked at two families of justification for
00:01:42
civil punishment.
00:01:43
A family of deontological or desert oriented theories on
00:01:49
the one hand--
00:01:50
theories that look at what somebody deserves.
00:01:53
And on the other hand, we looked at some
00:01:56
consequentialist theories--
00:01:57
theories that try to justify punishment on the basis of its
00:02:02
consequences.
00:02:03
And for each of those theories, we asked ourselves
00:02:08
how reasonable the justifications are that they
00:02:12
offer and what source of behaviors do
00:02:16
they seem to mandate.
00:02:17
And here we had the same sort of structure that we have
00:02:22
found throughout the course.
00:02:24
On the one hand, an articulation of a principled
00:02:28
framework for understanding a large segment of human
00:02:33
behavior that tries to lay down rules and guiding
00:02:39
principles by which we ought to structure behavior.
00:02:43
And on the other, we had intuitions
00:02:46
about particular cases.
00:02:48
And we found that here, as elsewhere, for many of you at
00:02:54
least, certainly for the students in my section and for
00:02:57
the students in the sections of the TAs that I've spoken
00:02:59
to, that there was a challenge reconciling on the one hand,
00:03:05
the philosophical framework that seemed truly compelling
показать еще
свой перевод
Работаем...
нет перевода